Conservation Reserve Program in North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 15,781
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in North Carolina totaled $188,014,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Faye S Bunn | Spring Hope, NC 27882 | $378,387 |
22 | Cds Farms LLC | Rocky Mount, NC 27804 | $373,650 |
23 | Marshall Dunn Jr | Pinetops, NC 27864 | $370,988 |
24 | W Brinkley Melvin | Fairfield, NC 27826 | $353,584 |
25 | Horace Lee Ambrose | Creswell, NC 27928 | $329,180 |
26 | Monroe Enzor Jr | Cerro Gordo, NC 28430 | $316,801 |
27 | Little Family Partnership | Wadesboro, NC 28170 | $311,170 |
28 | Roberts & Wellons Inc | Smithfield, NC 27577 | $309,064 |
29 | Martha E Courser | Littleton, NC 27850 | $304,525 |
30 | Lane Farms Inc | Goldsboro, NC 27530 | $303,323 |
31 | Lee Morris | Plymouth, NC 27962 | $299,430 |
32 | Dark Woods Wildlife Management Ll | Engelhard, NC 27824 | $295,288 |
33 | Savannah Farms LLC | Chapin, SC 29036 | $293,491 |
34 | Joseph H Jenkins | Ahoskie, NC 27910 | $293,416 |
35 | Wilson Associates-monroe | Charlotte, NC 28215 | $293,064 |
36 | Labear Farm LLC | Greensboro, NC 27401 | $289,252 |
37 | Ethel Norman Trust | Halifax, NC 27839 | $280,134 |
38 | Thomas F Webb | Greenville, NC 27835 | $279,764 |
39 | Connell Family Partnership | Warrenton, NC 27589 | $274,122 |
40 | C Wayne Boseman | Enfield, NC 27823 | $267,635 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”