Loan Deficiency in North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 19,146
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in North Carolina totaled $555,027,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thomas E Barrett | Seaboard, NC 27876 | $489,932 |
82 | Gold Hill Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $488,213 |
83 | Wiggins Farms | Trenton, NC 28585 | $485,562 |
84 | Rufus A Jackson | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $485,552 |
85 | Bateman Produce Farms Inc | Tyner, NC 27980 | $485,452 |
86 | Upland Southeast LLC | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $483,889 |
87 | Beech F Farms | Edenton, NC 27932 | $482,676 |
88 | Gary Hardison | Richlands, NC 28574 | $482,094 |
89 | Randy Darren Riggs | Pollocksville, NC 28573 | $479,945 |
90 | Henry & Tony Phillips Farms | Pinetops, NC 27864 | $477,194 |
91 | T R C Farms Inc | Cove City, NC 28523 | $476,969 |
92 | Mann Farms | Pendleton, NC 27862 | $475,727 |
93 | L E & Ed Winslow | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $475,278 |
94 | Haynes Stone Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $473,246 |
95 | Rainbow Farms Inc | Hamilton, NC 27840 | $472,867 |
96 | William Floyd Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $470,934 |
97 | Burgweger Farms | Brooklyn, WI 53521 | $469,846 |
98 | Raemon Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $467,321 |
99 | Lewis Whitfield Herring Jr | La Grange, NC 28551 | $466,126 |
100 | K W Jones Farms Inc | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $465,890 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”