Farm Subsidy information
North Carolina
Total Subsidies in North Carolina, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 6,049
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in North Carolina totaled $334,371,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Royce Mitchell Boyette | Clayton, NC 27527 | $153,510 |
102 | , | $153,365 | |
103 | Ronnie L Betts | Holly Springs, NC 27540 | $153,221 |
104 | Bal Farms LLC | Oxford, NC 27565 | $148,950 |
105 | M & M Berry Farm LLC | Edneyville, NC 28727 | $146,477 |
106 | H3 Cattle Company, LLC | Crumpler, NC 28617 | $145,140 |
107 | Myers Farms, Inc | Union Grove, NC 28689 | $144,672 |
108 | Michael Thomas Clayton Cross Creek Dairy Rock Hill | Hurdle Mills, NC 27541 | $144,009 |
109 | Charles Marvin Tart Sr | Dunn, NC 28334 | $143,207 |
110 | Beam Dairy LLC | Cherryville, NC 28021 | $142,893 |
111 | Jeffrey Boykin LLC | Sims, NC 27880 | $142,060 |
112 | Kooba Dairy Inc | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $141,993 |
113 | Michael L Gaster | Sanford, NC 27332 | $141,066 |
114 | Herman Dairy Farms, Inc | Taylorsville, NC 28681 | $140,946 |
115 | James H Roebuck | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $140,668 |
116 | Rhodes Berry Farm LLC | Hendersonville, NC 28792 | $140,369 |
117 | J W Mitchell Farms Inc | Franklin, NC 28734 | $139,678 |
118 | Malcolm Ray Wilson | Clinton, NC 28328 | $139,282 |
119 | G E Pendleton III Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $137,496 |
120 | Sanoca Farms LLC | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $137,349 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”