Total Conservation Programs in North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,919
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in North Carolina totaled $2,499,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Don R Hill | Chocowinity, NC 27817 | $3,865 |
122 | Agcarolina Farm Credit ** | Elizabeth City, NC 27906 | $3,856 |
123 | Carson Holding Brice | Raleigh, NC 27608 | $3,829 |
124 | Jesse F Braxton | Dover, NC 28526 | $3,820 |
125 | Mbv Family Trust | Richfield, NC 28137 | $3,778 |
126 | Grant Staton Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $3,763 |
127 | Narron Family Farms LLC | Goldsboro, NC 27534 | $3,758 |
128 | Earl Dawson Pugh Jr | Engelhard, NC 27824 | $3,719 |
129 | James D Gilliam Jr | Cary, NC 27519 | $3,719 |
130 | Lisa M Rives | Enfield, NC 27823 | $3,702 |
131 | Christopher J Morris | Enfield, NC 27823 | $3,702 |
132 | Ann Fitzmaurice | Hillsboro, OR 97124 | $3,697 |
133 | Kenneth R Ellis | Fremont, NC 27830 | $3,686 |
134 | Benjamin F Anderson Jr | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $3,683 |
135 | Gloria Godley Willis | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $3,660 |
136 | Cecil Scott Campbell II | Washington, NC 27889 | $3,647 |
137 | David Dwight Batts | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $3,645 |
138 | Karen H Cousins | Enfield, NC 27823 | $3,640 |
139 | Lillian Wallace | Goldsboro, NC 27530 | $3,565 |
140 | James E Griffin | New London, NC 28127 | $3,555 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”