Deficiency Payment in Alamance County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 83
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Alamance County, North Carolina totaled $42,552 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gary Eston Murray | Burlington, NC 27215 | $326 |
42 | James A Ross | Burlington, NC 27217 | $300 |
43 | N Jane Iseley | Burlington, NC 27217 | $293 |
44 | Allen Iseley | Burlington, NC 27217 | $293 |
45 | Louis H Graham | Burlington, NC 27217 | $280 |
46 | H A Whitesell | Elon College, NC 27244 | $275 |
47 | Stephen W Smith | Burlington, NC 27217 | $270 |
48 | Elaine Rice Rudd | Burlington, NC 27217 | $245 |
49 | Glenda H Davis | Burlington, NC 27217 | $231 |
50 | Donald E Smith | , 00000 | $220 |
51 | Wilson Cable | Elon College, NC 27244 | $196 |
52 | Roger Moorefield | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $195 |
53 | Leonard B Moorefield | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $195 |
54 | Margie R Brandt | Burlington, NC 27217 | $167 |
55 | J Talmadge Isley | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $154 |
56 | George W Edwards | Elon College, NC 27244 | $142 |
57 | Mozelle S Aldridge | Burlington, NC 27217 | $141 |
58 | James Phillip Aldridge | Burlington, NC 27217 | $141 |
59 | Robert Franklin Rhodes | Elon College, NC 27244 | $128 |
60 | Aubrey G Blanchard | Burlington, NC 27216 | $117 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”