Farm Subsidy information
Anson County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Anson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,424
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Anson County, North Carolina totaled $53,059,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Margie B Drye | Polkton, NC 28135 | $105,828 |
62 | Cecil Brent Stegall | Peachland, NC 28133 | $105,617 |
63 | Lockhart Farms LLC | Chapel Hill, NC 27517 | $104,880 |
64 | Olin Marsh | Marshville, NC 28103 | $103,670 |
65 | Dm Rushing Investments LLC | Marshville, NC 28103 | $103,166 |
66 | Teddy E Stegall Jr | Marshville, NC 28103 | $101,228 |
67 | Walker B Carpenter | Marshville, NC 28103 | $100,909 |
68 | Carroll Morgan Edwards Deceased | Marshville, NC 28103 | $100,356 |
69 | Malsgate Farms | Wadesboro, NC 28170 | $95,032 |
70 | N W Beachum | Ansonville, NC 28007 | $91,525 |
71 | Hargett Farms LLC | Marshville, NC 28103 | $84,990 |
72 | D Elaine Baker Burr | Wadesboro, NC 28170 | $84,061 |
73 | Michael Griffin | Polkton, NC 28135 | $83,650 |
74 | Helen C Liles Deceased | Wadesboro, NC 28170 | $83,042 |
75 | Rocky Pee Dee LLC | Kannapolis, NC 28082 | $82,465 |
76 | James E Martin III | Wadesboro, NC 28170 | $77,488 |
77 | Morgan Farms Inc | Morven, NC 28119 | $76,884 |
78 | Tommy Mccray | Peachland, NC 28133 | $76,458 |
79 | John T Mills | Greenville, NC 27858 | $75,169 |
80 | Frances L Edwards | Ansonville, NC 28007 | $74,756 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”