Loan Deficiency in Beaufort County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 531
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Beaufort County, North Carolina totaled $20,587,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Carolyn B Wright | Pantego, NC 27860 | $211,317 |
22 | Benson Farms Inc | Pantego, NC 27860 | $209,001 |
23 | Grissom Farms Inc | Washington, NC 27889 | $197,688 |
24 | Tankard Farms Inc | Bath, NC 27808 | $192,508 |
25 | John E Hudnell | Aurora, NC 27806 | $190,925 |
26 | Flatland Farms & Associates | Pantego, NC 27860 | $190,424 |
27 | Albemarle Shores Inc | Creswell, NC 27928 | $190,010 |
28 | Breezy Shore Farm Inc | Bath, NC 27808 | $188,487 |
29 | Pungo Creek Farms Inc | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $187,702 |
30 | Stephen R Poole Jr | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $185,238 |
31 | R H Bishop Jr | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $184,812 |
32 | Stephen Gerard | Blounts Creek, NC 27814 | $182,974 |
33 | Zeno O Ratcliff Inc | Pantego, NC 27860 | $180,430 |
34 | James Todd Boyd | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $179,160 |
35 | W Edward Clayton | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $175,371 |
36 | Griffin Farms Inc | Washington, NC 27889 | $165,863 |
37 | Js Farms Inc | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $165,037 |
38 | John T Robbins III | Bath, NC 27808 | $162,433 |
39 | Michael W Bishop | Pantego, NC 27860 | $157,236 |
40 | H Clark Peele | Pantego, NC 27860 | $155,630 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”