Counter Cyclical Program in Beaufort County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 545
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Beaufort County, North Carolina totaled $14,736,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Kevin H Armstrong | Pantego, NC 27860 | $23,983 |
122 | H Clark Peele | Pantego, NC 27860 | $23,972 |
123 | James Marshall Cutler | Pantego, NC 27860 | $23,918 |
124 | W Shawn Harding And Tracey D Hard | Chocowinity, NC 27817 | $23,684 |
125 | Michael Todd Phelps | Columbia, NC 27925 | $23,247 |
126 | Robert L Harrison | Williamston, NC 27892 | $23,231 |
127 | Renee W Armstrong | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $22,959 |
128 | Ricky Lee Buck | Greenville, NC 27858 | $22,944 |
129 | Matkins Farms Inc | Washington, NC 27889 | $22,797 |
130 | Kimberly B Armstrong | Pantego, NC 27860 | $22,764 |
131 | George D Ross III | Bath, NC 27808 | $22,695 |
132 | Stephen R Poole III | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $22,027 |
133 | Phil Garris | Washington, NC 27889 | $21,529 |
134 | Torrey Alan Phelps | Creswell, NC 27928 | $20,293 |
135 | E H Roberson III | Williamston, NC 27892 | $20,293 |
136 | Michael R Cutler | Pantego, NC 27860 | $19,935 |
137 | Randy Moore Farms Inc | Bath, NC 27808 | $19,919 |
138 | Black Brothers | Washington, NC 27889 | $19,592 |
139 | Mart Benson Farms Inc | Pantego, NC 27860 | $19,211 |
140 | Robert Paramore Jr | Grimesland, NC 27837 | $18,649 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”