Counter Cyclical Program in Beaufort County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 545
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Beaufort County, North Carolina totaled $14,736,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Herbert A Perry | Washington, NC 27889 | $145,132 |
22 | Leamon H Allen III | Pantego, NC 27860 | $142,053 |
23 | William C Haddock | Chocowinity, NC 27817 | $136,248 |
24 | Thomas B Ormond Jr | Bath, NC 27808 | $133,964 |
25 | Sheila B Ormond | Bath, NC 27808 | $133,963 |
26 | James Russell Boyd | Washington, NC 27889 | $132,091 |
27 | Michael W Bishop | Pantego, NC 27860 | $126,902 |
28 | Phyllis Boyd | Washington, NC 27889 | $126,449 |
29 | James Todd Boyd | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $119,010 |
30 | Benjamin G Carowan Jr | Pantego, NC 27860 | $112,363 |
31 | Norman Jerol Selby Jr | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $109,837 |
32 | Gregory L Harris | Pantego, NC 27860 | $105,677 |
33 | Pungo Creek Farms Inc | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $88,910 |
34 | Breezy Shore Farm Inc | Bath, NC 27808 | $88,301 |
35 | Persimmon Branch Farms | Grantsboro, NC 28529 | $88,036 |
36 | Griffin Farms Inc | Washington, NC 27889 | $86,868 |
37 | Wallace & Keith Respess Farms | Pantego, NC 27860 | $85,160 |
38 | Van Staalduinen Farms Inc | Pantego, NC 27860 | $82,884 |
39 | Stephen R Poole Jr | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $82,443 |
40 | Joc Farms LLC | Greenville, NC 27834 | $81,216 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”