Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Bladen County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 133
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Bladen County, North Carolina totaled $2,801,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Donnie Wayne Dowless | Elizabethtown, NC 28337 | $2,491 |
102 | Douglas B. Roberts | Tar Heel, NC 28392 | $2,287 |
103 | Jennifer D Beyer | Ivanhoe, NC 28447 | $2,212 |
104 | Lillie Jane Smith Cain | Garland, NC 28441 | $2,168 |
105 | Arnold Lee Bryan | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $2,053 |
106 | James B Priest III | Council, NC 28434 | $1,935 |
107 | Wilfred T Cromartie | Kelly, NC 28448 | $1,890 |
108 | Mark H Allen Jr | Dublin, NC 28332 | $1,852 |
109 | Kenneth L Cain | Garland, NC 28441 | $1,848 |
110 | Kimberly Dowless Roberts | Tar Heel, NC 28392 | $1,826 |
111 | Jeffery Scott Beard | Elizabethtown, NC 28337 | $1,772 |
112 | Norman Leroy Tatum | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $1,512 |
113 | Tanner C Singletary | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $1,370 |
114 | James L Allen Jr | Tar Heel, NC 28392 | $1,152 |
115 | Cedric Pernell Bryant | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $1,050 |
116 | Daron C Bill | Fayetteville, NC 28311 | $1,016 |
117 | Lillian Hall Corbett | Wilmington, NC 28403 | $1,000 |
118 | Jeffrey Scott Beard | Elizabethtown, NC 28337 | $982 |
119 | Cecil Wayne Pate | Garland, NC 28441 | $814 |
120 | Elaine H Potter | Kelly, NC 28448 | $780 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”