Farm Subsidy information
Bladen County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Bladen County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 323
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bladen County, North Carolina totaled $14,153,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Singletary Farms LLC | Tar Heel, NC 28392 | $92,812 |
22 | Bricklyn W Rooks | Whiteville, NC 28472 | $92,290 |
23 | Woodrow W Marlowe Jr | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $90,567 |
24 | Simpson Farms LLC | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $90,381 |
25 | Hall Brothers Farms Inc | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $87,750 |
26 | La Blanc Vineyard | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $81,433 |
27 | Estelle Russ | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $79,945 |
28 | Barnes Food Company | Garland, NC 28441 | $78,094 |
29 | Ag 18 Inc | Garland, NC 28441 | $74,786 |
30 | Son Rise Farms LLC | Kelly, NC 28448 | $73,629 |
31 | R W Skinner LLC | Elizabethtown, NC 28337 | $72,632 |
32 | William Ray Storms | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $71,793 |
33 | Steven C Smith | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $71,717 |
34 | Scott Edwards | Dublin, NC 28332 | $71,033 |
35 | Steven H Dunham | White Oak, NC 28399 | $66,510 |
36 | Donnie Wayne Dowless | Elizabethtown, NC 28337 | $66,295 |
37 | Cypress Creek Huckleberry Farms Inc | Garland, NC 28441 | $58,052 |
38 | G & R Farms Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $55,553 |
39 | Norman Derrick Russ | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $53,188 |
40 | Premier Timber Harvesting LLC | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $52,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”