Market Loss Assistance Program in Cabarrus County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 190
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Cabarrus County, North Carolina totaled $703,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | J David Honeycutt | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $903 |
82 | Francesco Azzarello | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $884 |
83 | Claude M Hurlocker | Raleigh, NC 27609 | $862 |
84 | Adam F Heglar | Concord, NC 28025 | $832 |
85 | Vance C Cline Jr Estate | Concord, NC 28025 | $814 |
86 | David T Barringer | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $789 |
87 | C Everett Voncannon Estate | Midland, NC 28107 | $739 |
88 | John T Bunn | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $717 |
89 | E Alice Hill | Concord, NC 28025 | $714 |
90 | David Allen Hill | Marshville, NC 28103 | $714 |
91 | Franklin Dale Aldridge | Concord, NC 28027 | $713 |
92 | Helen M Little Estate | Midland, NC 28107 | $677 |
93 | Steve Mcmath | Kannapolis, NC 28081 | $637 |
94 | Carl Pless | Rockwell, NC 28138 | $631 |
95 | H E Cline Heirs | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $621 |
96 | Clifford L Summers II | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $614 |
97 | George L Barrier III | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $610 |
98 | Frances Johnston C/o Lee | Concord, NC 28027 | $607 |
99 | Jimmy Hartsell | Midland, NC 28107 | $593 |
100 | Dennis C Poplin | Richfield, NC 28137 | $593 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”