Production Flexibility Program in Cabarrus County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 213
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Cabarrus County, North Carolina totaled $1,139,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | M B Black Estate | Midland, NC 28107 | $1,786 |
82 | Wilburn Williams Family Farm LLC | Midland, NC 28107 | $1,781 |
83 | George L Barrier III | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $1,732 |
84 | Francesco Azzarello | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $1,706 |
85 | David T Barringer | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $1,647 |
86 | Dennis C Poplin | Richfield, NC 28137 | $1,634 |
87 | Vance C Cline Jr Estate | Concord, NC 28025 | $1,575 |
88 | Adam F Heglar | Concord, NC 28025 | $1,461 |
89 | C Everett Voncannon Estate | Midland, NC 28107 | $1,445 |
90 | Franklin Dale Aldridge | Concord, NC 28027 | $1,434 |
91 | James E Stroup | Charlotte, NC 28213 | $1,423 |
92 | R J Barringer | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $1,410 |
93 | John T Bunn | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $1,396 |
94 | Gary D Harwood | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $1,368 |
95 | Kenneth P Furr | Concord, NC 28025 | $1,331 |
96 | Sam J Motley Jr | Stanfield, NC 28163 | $1,295 |
97 | Frances Johnston C/o Lee | Concord, NC 28027 | $1,222 |
98 | Carl Pless | Rockwell, NC 28138 | $1,203 |
99 | Helen M Little Estate | Midland, NC 28107 | $1,175 |
100 | Tommy Wayne Eudy | New London, NC 28127 | $1,165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”