Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Chatham County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 168
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Chatham County, North Carolina totaled $317,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Horney Livestock Company | Siler City, NC 27344 | $45,041 |
2 | B & F Farms Of Nc, LLC | Sanford, NC 27330 | $24,967 |
3 | Benjamin W Dunlap | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $10,920 |
4 | Moore Cattle Company LLC | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $9,671 |
5 | Ronald L Teague | Siler City, NC 27344 | $7,846 |
6 | Paul W Price | Goldston, NC 27252 | $6,714 |
7 | A Parker Culberson | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,440 |
8 | Keith A Tuttle Farms Inc | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,362 |
9 | Clyde R Perry Jr | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,119 |
10 | George Daniel Pike | Siler City, NC 27344 | $4,760 |
11 | B Henry Stinson | Goldston, NC 27252 | $4,560 |
12 | Stephen K Moore | Siler City, NC 27344 | $4,150 |
13 | Tommy Tally | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $4,141 |
14 | Larry Travis Lemons | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $3,510 |
15 | John Barton Mitchell | Siler City, NC 27344 | $3,217 |
16 | Jerry L Frye | Bennett, NC 27208 | $2,958 |
17 | Winfred E Allen | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,861 |
18 | Steve Clark Phillips | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,829 |
19 | Walter Jack Smith Jr | Staley, NC 27355 | $2,804 |
20 | John Headen | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,769 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>