Tobacco Loss Assistance Program in Chatham County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 165
Recipients of Tobacco Loss Assistance Program from farms in Chatham County, North Carolina totaled $503,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ned B Diggs | Chapel Hill, NC 27517 | $3,410 |
22 | Sherwood E Johnson | New Hill, NC 27562 | $3,197 |
23 | Randy Rosser | Sanford, NC 27330 | $3,044 |
24 | Kevin Ray Lee | Sanford, NC 27330 | $2,966 |
25 | Charles Benny Lee Jr | Sanford, NC 27330 | $2,966 |
26 | Robert Payton Lee | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $2,966 |
27 | Steve D Logan | Apex, NC 27502 | $2,964 |
28 | Sherry Diane Womack | Sanford, NC 27330 | $2,707 |
29 | Gay Goodwin | Apex, NC 27502 | $2,540 |
30 | Don Goodwin | Apex, NC 27502 | $2,383 |
31 | Paul Elwood Fearrington Jr | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $2,344 |
32 | Dorothy Lewis Cooke | Cary, NC 27519 | $2,113 |
33 | Inez E Truelove | New Hill, NC 27562 | $2,083 |
34 | Norma C Hart | Gulf, NC 27256 | $2,015 |
35 | Richard J Jenks Jr | New Hill, NC 27562 | $1,992 |
36 | William Herbert Goodwin | New Hill, NC 27562 | $1,957 |
37 | J E Booth | Durham, NC 27713 | $1,942 |
38 | Ray Mayton Upchurch | Broadway, NC 27505 | $1,928 |
39 | Kent Goodwin | Apex, NC 27502 | $1,883 |
40 | James H Diggs | Chapel Hill, NC 27517 | $1,714 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”