Total Commodity Programs in Chatham County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 225
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chatham County, North Carolina totaled $951,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Joy C Brewer | Bennett, NC 27208 | $9,625 |
22 | Joseph C Conrad | Siler City, NC 27344 | $8,657 |
23 | Charles C Holt Jr | Goldston, NC 27252 | $8,067 |
24 | Ronald L Teague | Siler City, NC 27344 | $7,846 |
25 | Michael Andrew Lindley | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $7,700 |
26 | Walter Jack Smith Jr | Staley, NC 27355 | $7,509 |
27 | Christopher W Mcpherson | Siler City, NC 27344 | $6,848 |
28 | Sue L Nelson | Siler City, NC 27344 | $6,501 |
29 | Frank Kent Dickens | Moncure, NC 27559 | $6,432 |
30 | Mark A Mcmath | Siler City, NC 27344 | $6,215 |
31 | Michael Alan Brooks | Goldston, NC 27252 | $6,110 |
32 | Brenda Szilvay | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,459 |
33 | A Parker Culberson | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,440 |
34 | Keith A Tuttle Farms Inc | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,362 |
35 | Ronald L Dameron | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,301 |
36 | Tracy Culberson | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,225 |
37 | P Dean Phillips | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $5,170 |
38 | Kenneth Daniel Moody | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,132 |
39 | Clyde R Perry Jr | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,119 |
40 | William J Perry | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,102 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”