Total Commodity Programs in Chatham County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 801
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chatham County, North Carolina totaled $10,739,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Michael Alan Brooks | Goldston, NC 27252 | $31,915 |
62 | B Henry Stinson | Goldston, NC 27252 | $30,691 |
63 | Charles Benny Lee Jr | Sanford, NC 27330 | $30,007 |
64 | Tommy Tally | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $29,534 |
65 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $28,024 |
66 | Richard J Jenks Jr | New Hill, NC 27562 | $26,615 |
67 | Brooks Properties LLC | Siler City, NC 27344 | $26,226 |
68 | Inez M Poe | Apex, NC 27502 | $26,073 |
69 | W Lee Cloer | Burlington, NC 27215 | $26,070 |
70 | John Headen | Siler City, NC 27344 | $25,957 |
71 | George Daniel Pike | Siler City, NC 27344 | $25,379 |
72 | Clyde R Davis Sr | Siler City, NC 27344 | $24,496 |
73 | Peggy Lindley | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $23,939 |
74 | Thomas Quentin Fox White | Liberty, NC 27298 | $23,883 |
75 | Gordon Thomas Estate | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $23,348 |
76 | J Calvin Williams Estate | Staley, NC 27355 | $23,340 |
77 | Reeves Family Limited Partnership | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $23,306 |
78 | Winfred E Allen | Siler City, NC 27344 | $22,907 |
79 | Brenda Szilvay | Siler City, NC 27344 | $22,299 |
80 | William Y Kimball | Siler City, NC 27344 | $22,197 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”