Total Commodity Programs in Chatham County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 225
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chatham County, North Carolina totaled $951,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | William Robert Fitts III | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,550 |
62 | Reeves Family LLC | Raleigh, NC 27612 | $2,497 |
63 | Vicki O Phillips | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,475 |
64 | Culberson Brothers | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $2,473 |
65 | O Lane Woolard | Goldston, NC 27252 | $2,427 |
66 | C W Lemons Jr | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,382 |
67 | Neill Matthews | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,381 |
68 | James A Clapp | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,350 |
69 | James Doug Ellis | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $2,320 |
70 | Robert Peter Dowd III | Goldston, NC 27252 | $2,312 |
71 | James B Brewer | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,293 |
72 | William Y Kimball | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,206 |
73 | Richard D Kirkman | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,124 |
74 | Kelly Freeman | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $2,113 |
75 | Edward H Straughn | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $2,105 |
76 | C Darrell Brewer | Goldston, NC 27252 | $2,081 |
77 | Debra K Green | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,058 |
78 | Oak Grove Farm | Siler City, NC 27344 | $2,021 |
79 | Michael Fred Wilson | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $1,980 |
80 | James R Gilliland Jr | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $1,926 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”