Farm Subsidy information
Chatham County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Chatham County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,248
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chatham County, North Carolina totaled $20,100,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Keith A Tuttle Farms Inc | Siler City, NC 27344 | $157,748 |
22 | Benjamin W Dunlap | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $143,766 |
23 | Russell J Johnson | Siler City, NC 27344 | $137,482 |
24 | Royce Webster | Apex, NC 27523 | $137,133 |
25 | Strowd Bros Dairy | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $127,882 |
26 | Ronald L Teague | Siler City, NC 27344 | $127,497 |
27 | Joseph R Jones | Burlington, NC 27215 | $125,656 |
28 | Robert Payton Lee | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $123,358 |
29 | Rosser Farms LLC | Sanford, NC 27330 | $114,804 |
30 | Randy Rosser | Sanford, NC 27330 | $110,148 |
31 | Paul W Price | Goldston, NC 27252 | $107,908 |
32 | B & F Farms Of Nc, LLC | Sanford, NC 27330 | $106,780 |
33 | Gary M Thomas | Sanford, NC 27330 | $103,208 |
34 | Darryle Lindley | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $101,296 |
35 | Palletone Of North Carolina | Siler City, NC 27344 | $100,386 |
36 | Sherry Diane Womack | Sanford, NC 27330 | $87,592 |
37 | Theresa C Stevens | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $86,423 |
38 | Councilman Farms | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $81,494 |
39 | John S Glosson | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $80,248 |
40 | Lindo Webster | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $79,219 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”