Farm Subsidy information
Chatham County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Chatham County, North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 98
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chatham County, North Carolina totaled $777,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R D Lee Farms Inc | Erwin, NC 28339 | $108,926 |
| 2 | Rosser Farms LLC | Sanford, NC 27330 | $60,101 |
| 3 | Josh White | Siler City, NC 27344 | $49,157 |
| 4 | Phillips Farms | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $46,423 |
| 5 | Travis Wayne Buchanan | Sanford, NC 27330 | $45,821 |
| 6 | Jerry W Crawford | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $33,336 |
| 7 | Johnny L Hussey | Bennett, NC 27208 | $21,684 |
| 8 | Billy Joe Gaddy & Walter K Gaddy | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $20,403 |
| 9 | Charles Philip Cook | Siler City, NC 27344 | $19,282 |
| 10 | Michael Alan Brooks | Goldston, NC 27252 | $17,760 |
| 11 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $15,896 |
| 12 | Manco Farm Inc | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $14,274 |
| 13 | Neill Lindley | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $13,302 |
| 14 | Brush Creek Swiss Farm | Siler City, NC 27344 | $12,445 |
| 15 | Michael Andrew Lindley | Siler City, NC 27344 | $8,070 |
| 16 | Michael Andrew Lindley | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $8,018 |
| 17 | E Shannon York | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,914 |
| 18 | Ronald L Teague | Siler City, NC 27344 | $3,860 |
| 19 | H David Mclaurin Jr | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $3,525 |
| 20 | Darin L Fridley | Apex, NC 27539 | $3,326 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf