Market Loss Assistance Program in Chatham County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 208
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Chatham County, North Carolina totaled $640,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Daniel C Kelly | Sanford, NC 27330 | $6,950 |
22 | David W Kelly | Sanford, NC 27330 | $6,950 |
23 | Billy Edward York Jr | Siler City, NC 27344 | $5,352 |
24 | Billy E Teague | Siler City, NC 27344 | $4,853 |
25 | Gordon Thomas Estate | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $4,838 |
26 | Charles Philip Cook | Siler City, NC 27344 | $4,341 |
27 | J Calvin Williams Estate | Staley, NC 27355 | $3,943 |
28 | Ramon Fridley Estate | Cary, NC 27511 | $3,936 |
29 | Emma Judy Johnson | Siler City, NC 27344 | $3,891 |
30 | James R Albright | Siler City, NC 27344 | $3,857 |
31 | Gary M Thomas | Sanford, NC 27330 | $3,838 |
32 | Jimmy T Johnson Estate | Siler City, NC 27344 | $3,800 |
33 | Sherrill F Lindley | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $3,609 |
34 | John S Glosson | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $3,577 |
35 | H Paige Perry | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $3,563 |
36 | Frank Kent Dickens | Moncure, NC 27559 | $3,469 |
37 | B Zaitz & Sons Co | Chapel Hill, NC 27515 | $3,462 |
38 | Clyde R Davis Sr | Siler City, NC 27344 | $3,425 |
39 | William Roy Johnson | Siler City, NC 27344 | $3,361 |
40 | Mary Joyce Taylor | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $3,106 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”