Peanut Quota Buyout Program in Chowan County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 799
Recipients of Peanut Quota Buyout Program from farms in Chowan County, North Carolina totaled $6,470,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Peanut Quota Buyout Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Erle S Solesbee | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $15,835 |
82 | Mary Alice Riddick | Edenton, NC 27932 | $15,370 |
83 | Catherine Hofler Perry | Hobbsville, NC 27946 | $15,250 |
84 | Frances W Byrum | Edenton, NC 27932 | $15,185 |
85 | Ray Byrum | Edenton, NC 27932 | $15,180 |
86 | Peele Brothers Inc | Edenton, NC 27932 | $15,055 |
87 | Robert M Francis | Edenton, NC 27932 | $14,705 |
88 | Oscar Spivey | Hobbsville, NC 27946 | $14,610 |
89 | David M Hare | Tyner, NC 27980 | $14,560 |
90 | Brent Griffin | Edenton, NC 27932 | $14,475 |
91 | Forrest E Lane | Tyner, NC 27980 | $14,400 |
92 | W Sanford Byrum | Edenton, NC 27932 | $14,115 |
93 | Dr Walter L Bloom Md | Edenton, NC 27932 | $14,030 |
94 | Lillie Stroud | Edenton, NC 27932 | $13,940 |
95 | Sallie O Layton Hare | Edenton, NC 27932 | $13,845 |
96 | Joseph Wallace Goodwin III | Edenton, NC 27932 | $13,815 |
97 | Jimmy Ward | Tyner, NC 27980 | $13,770 |
98 | Richard E Stallings | Belvidere, NC 27919 | $13,655 |
99 | James A Fleetwood | Edenton, NC 27932 | $13,615 |
100 | Edna K Bunch | Edenton, NC 27932 | $13,465 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”