Farm Subsidy information
Columbus County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Columbus County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 389
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Columbus County, North Carolina totaled $13,575,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Christine Patrick | Bolton, NC 28423 | $13,234 |
122 | Dalan Allen Hobbs | Chadbourn, NC 28431 | $13,006 |
123 | Miles Floyd Jackson | Dunn, NC 28334 | $12,207 |
124 | Jfc Partnership, LLC | Autryville, NC 28318 | $11,950 |
125 | Boar Branch LLC | Clarendon, NC 28432 | $10,905 |
126 | Terry G King | Tabor City, NC 28463 | $10,797 |
127 | Nobles & Son Farms LLC | Whiteville, NC 28472 | $10,662 |
128 | Gene A Nobles | Whiteville, NC 28472 | $10,552 |
129 | Bennett A Wilder | Tabor City, NC 28463 | $10,143 |
130 | Marlowe Farm LLC | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $10,136 |
131 | Swinging Tail Cattle Co Inc | Evergreen, NC 28438 | $9,522 |
132 | Estelle Russ | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $9,240 |
133 | Roger Delane Thomas | Clarendon, NC 28432 | $9,021 |
134 | Ann F Hardee | Tabor City, NC 28463 | $8,921 |
135 | Brenda W Mcpherson | Chadbourn, NC 28431 | $8,807 |
136 | Kevin Smith | Chadbourn, NC 28431 | $8,686 |
137 | Edward S Miller | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $8,529 |
138 | Howard Reed Mclam | Whiteville, NC 28472 | $8,428 |
139 | Jonathan Hayes | Cerro Gordo, NC 28430 | $8,301 |
140 | Brett P Barnhill | Evergreen, NC 28438 | $8,082 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”