Farm Subsidy information
Columbus County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Columbus County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 389
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Columbus County, North Carolina totaled $13,575,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Robert W Watts | Nakina, NC 28455 | $4,118 |
182 | John David Blosser | Nakina, NC 28455 | $4,073 |
183 | Mitchell D Strickland | Green Sea, SC 29545 | $3,875 |
184 | Teresa Gore | Nakina, NC 28455 | $3,673 |
185 | Kenneth Faulk | Nakina, NC 28455 | $3,578 |
186 | Timothy Andrew Kinlaw | Evergreen, NC 28438 | $3,570 |
187 | Herman Van Hayes | Cerro Gordo, NC 28430 | $3,538 |
188 | Danny Hammond | Nichols, SC 29581 | $3,531 |
189 | King & King Farms Inc | Ash, NC 28420 | $3,500 |
190 | Pamela D. Prince | Tabor City, NC 28463 | $3,432 |
191 | Mickey Hobbs | Chadbourn, NC 28431 | $3,416 |
192 | Travis L Sellers | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $3,355 |
193 | Jerry D Mitchell | Lake Waccamaw, NC 28450 | $3,267 |
194 | Double R Farms | Whiteville, NC 28472 | $3,264 |
195 | William Ray Fowler | Fair Bluff, NC 28439 | $3,244 |
196 | Robert A Thompson | Clarendon, NC 28432 | $3,214 |
197 | William G Fairfax | Tabor City, NC 28463 | $3,144 |
198 | Larry Carl Fowler | Riegelwood, NC 28456 | $3,134 |
199 | John Paul Dudley Jr | Chadbourn, NC 28431 | $3,124 |
200 | David B Lovett | Tabor City, NC 28463 | $3,116 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”