Farm Subsidy information
Columbus County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Columbus County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 5,991
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Columbus County, North Carolina totaled $267,383,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jerry Deams Godwin | Clarendon, NC 28432 | $764,561 |
42 | Shannon Joe Ward | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $763,825 |
43 | Foley Farms LLC | Fair Bluff, NC 28439 | $754,941 |
44 | Swinging Tail Cattle Co Inc | Evergreen, NC 28438 | $724,236 |
45 | William Barry Freedman | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $721,649 |
46 | Jason H Hayes | Cerro Gordo, NC 28430 | $715,169 |
47 | Jerry L Sellers | Whiteville, NC 28472 | $713,682 |
48 | Donald E Turbeville | Cerro Gordo, NC 28430 | $706,941 |
49 | Angell Farm Inc | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $694,923 |
50 | Roy Craig Rogers | Chadbourn, NC 28431 | $681,900 |
51 | Shan Spivey | Clarendon, NC 28432 | $654,709 |
52 | Eugene Mckeithan | Nakina, NC 28455 | $654,107 |
53 | Ray Farms | Whiteville, NC 28472 | $645,663 |
54 | Lonnie David Gore | Nakina, NC 28455 | $627,988 |
55 | Chandler Worley | Cerro Gordo, NC 28430 | $626,595 |
56 | Brett Dorsch | Whiteville, NC 28472 | $619,495 |
57 | Rbg Farms LLC | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $615,880 |
58 | Gary Simmons | Chadbourn, NC 28431 | $605,945 |
59 | Wayne C Patrick | Bolton, NC 28423 | $598,992 |
60 | King Farming Enterprises LLC | Ash, NC 28420 | $584,331 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”