Production Flexibility Program in Davie County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 135
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Davie County, North Carolina totaled $1,039,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Shore Brothers | Yadkinville, NC 27055 | $9,751 |
22 | Tony Prevette | Harmony, NC 28634 | $9,319 |
23 | J M Bowden Jr | Advance, NC 27006 | $8,437 |
24 | Dale Chaffin | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $8,413 |
25 | John W Swisher | Harmony, NC 28634 | $7,882 |
26 | T Leroy Dyson Sr | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $7,717 |
27 | Larry Doub | East Bend, NC 27018 | $7,150 |
28 | Williams Dairy Farm | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $7,108 |
29 | Phillip R Cartner & William A Bowles Ptr | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $6,860 |
30 | Terry Cornatzer | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $6,323 |
31 | Charles W Lutz | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $6,111 |
32 | C Coy Barnes | Advance, NC 27006 | $6,030 |
33 | R G Allen | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $5,698 |
34 | Jerry Wayne Eller | Yadkinville, NC 27055 | $4,734 |
35 | Gilmer R Allen | Advance, NC 27006 | $4,533 |
36 | Joe F Shamel Dba Boger Farm | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $4,146 |
37 | Stroud Brothers Grading | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $4,084 |
38 | George Daywalt | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $4,049 |
39 | H T Crotts & Son | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $4,005 |
40 | Michael H Swicegood | Lexington, NC 27295 | $4,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”