Farm Subsidy information
Duplin County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Duplin County, North Carolina, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 259
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Duplin County, North Carolina totaled $11,988,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Luther Yates Ivey | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $5,278 |
42 | Rooks King Wells | Rose Hill, NC 28458 | $5,231 |
43 | Timothy Killette | Warsaw, NC 28398 | $5,184 |
44 | Gregory Ray Murphy | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $5,146 |
45 | Roland Boney Jr | Rose Hill, NC 28458 | $5,035 |
46 | Eric Justin Price | Wallace, NC 28466 | $4,986 |
47 | Phillip Sanderson | Warsaw, NC 28398 | $4,926 |
48 | Christopher Alan Whitman | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $4,897 |
49 | , | $4,787 | |
50 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $4,695 |
51 | Ralph Lanier Jr | Beulaville, NC 28518 | $4,638 |
52 | Donnie Ransom Hardison | Stella, NC 28582 | $4,546 |
53 | Hugh G Miller Sr | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $4,378 |
54 | Annette T Tyndall | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $4,304 |
55 | George M Johnson Jr | Warsaw, NC 28398 | $4,276 |
56 | Anthony Clay Butts | Warsaw, NC 28398 | $4,270 |
57 | Kevin W Jarman | Beulaville, NC 28518 | $3,780 |
58 | Triple M Incorporated | Clinton, NC 28328 | $3,662 |
59 | David Lewis Whitman | Kenansville, NC 28349 | $3,647 |
60 | Advantage Farms LLC | Wilmington, NC 28409 | $3,387 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”