Total Disaster Programs in Duplin County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,504
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Duplin County, North Carolina totaled $56,231,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Vinson Price Farms Inc | Seven Springs, NC 28578 | $185,003 |
82 | David Thomas Chestnutt | Magnolia, NC 28453 | $179,687 |
83 | Benjamin L Whaley | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $177,395 |
84 | Ruth Ann R Turner | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $176,931 |
85 | Milton R Hunter | Wallace, NC 28466 | $174,862 |
86 | Eugene Rivenbark | Wallace, NC 28466 | $173,870 |
87 | Jeffrey J English | Chinquapin, NC 28521 | $172,941 |
88 | Thomas E Smith | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $172,348 |
89 | Nicholas Lee Swinson | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $171,539 |
90 | Ralph Lanier Jr | Beulaville, NC 28518 | $171,451 |
91 | Larry D Stokes | Magnolia, NC 28453 | $167,109 |
92 | Lucas Farms | Turkey, NC 28393 | $161,312 |
93 | Bennie W Barwick | Seven Springs, NC 28578 | $160,838 |
94 | E Carroll Jackson | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $158,836 |
95 | Creekside Farming LLC | Kenansville, NC 28349 | $158,629 |
96 | Mitchell K Paige | Faison, NC 28341 | $158,353 |
97 | William S Draughon | Kenansville, NC 28349 | $158,216 |
98 | Herman Clark Sullivan | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $155,302 |
99 | Timothy Lynn Smith | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $154,039 |
100 | Rouse Brothers Produce Inc | Rose Hill, NC 28458 | $153,878 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”