Loan Deficiency in Duplin County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 783
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Duplin County, North Carolina totaled $17,598,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thomas Bland Chestnutt | Magnolia, NC 28453 | $58,633 |
82 | Bradford Dean Gurley | Goldsboro, NC 27530 | $58,293 |
83 | Gregory David Vance | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $58,067 |
84 | William J Wells Jr | Teachey, NC 28464 | $57,669 |
85 | Clayton Lee Debose | Magnolia, NC 28453 | $57,620 |
86 | Mitchell K Paige | Faison, NC 28341 | $54,383 |
87 | Keith Ray Beavers | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $54,321 |
88 | Kitsie A Jones | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $53,500 |
89 | Henry P Lucas Jr | Turkey, NC 28393 | $52,918 |
90 | Teresa K Swinson | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $52,629 |
91 | S Winslow Tew III | Albertson, NC 28508 | $49,314 |
92 | J E Grady Sr | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $49,280 |
93 | Ralph Lanier Jr | Beulaville, NC 28518 | $47,591 |
94 | Dulan Wallace | Rose Hill, NC 28458 | $47,387 |
95 | Raymond L Turner III | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $45,508 |
96 | George Thomas Rose | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $45,394 |
97 | James D Hinson | Turkey, NC 28393 | $44,309 |
98 | Lindon Ray Sutton Jr | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $43,040 |
99 | William C Lanier | Beulaville, NC 28518 | $43,015 |
100 | John Samuel Marks | Wallace, NC 28466 | $42,729 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”