Loan Deficiency in Duplin County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 783
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Duplin County, North Carolina totaled $17,598,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Richard F Lanier | Beulaville, NC 28518 | $36,078 |
122 | Marion Levon Sandlin Sr | Chinquapin, NC 28521 | $35,049 |
123 | James Ralph Britt Jr | Calypso, NC 28325 | $34,386 |
124 | Michael A Knowles | Rose Hill, NC 28458 | $34,297 |
125 | Robert Ivey | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $34,200 |
126 | C B Godbold Farms Inc | Warsaw, NC 28398 | $33,408 |
127 | Kenton C Smith | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $33,362 |
128 | E&kfarms Inc | Rose Hill, NC 28458 | $33,295 |
129 | Tony Randall Kennedy | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $32,912 |
130 | Clifton Wayne Kennedy | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $32,775 |
131 | Nathan H Bell | Warsaw, NC 28398 | $32,726 |
132 | Thomas Leroy Frederick | Warsaw, NC 28398 | $32,546 |
133 | C & T Farms | Albertson, NC 28508 | $32,293 |
134 | Raymond L Sellers | Teachey, NC 28464 | $32,127 |
135 | Ronald L Sellers | Rose Hill, NC 28458 | $31,663 |
136 | Wendell Evans Jr | Magnolia, NC 28453 | $31,087 |
137 | Davis T Bland Jr | Magnolia, NC 28453 | $30,506 |
138 | Mark Bland | Kenansville, NC 28349 | $30,036 |
139 | Anthony C Smith Farms Partnership | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $29,689 |
140 | Benjamin L Whaley | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $29,428 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”