Total Conservation Programs in Duplin County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 341
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Duplin County, North Carolina totaled $2,386,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Herbert Smith Family Farms LLC | Magnolia, NC 28453 | $2,585 |
162 | Clarence G Thigpen Jr | Beulaville, NC 28518 | $2,451 |
163 | Anthony K Devane | Rose Hill, NC 28458 | $2,440 |
164 | Gene A Bradshaw | Faison, NC 28341 | $2,430 |
165 | D Mckinley Price | Goldsboro, NC 27534 | $2,406 |
166 | M R Bennett | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $2,385 |
167 | David T Phillips Farms Inc | Kenansville, NC 28349 | $2,377 |
168 | Thomas Leon Stroud | Albertson, NC 28508 | $2,376 |
169 | Albert D Mozingo | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $2,369 |
170 | Smith And Davis Farms | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $2,275 |
171 | Perry L Grady | Raleigh, NC 27606 | $2,250 |
172 | Eddie Earl Griffin | Beulaville, NC 28518 | $2,213 |
173 | James Edwards Brice | Newberry, SC 29108 | $2,211 |
174 | Donald K Outlaw | Seven Springs, NC 28578 | $2,200 |
175 | Retha Mae Smith | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $2,180 |
176 | Neil Barwick | Kenansville, NC 28349 | $2,168 |
177 | D C Miller | Warsaw, NC 28398 | $2,130 |
178 | Mattie Hargrove Atkinson | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $2,124 |
179 | John Garris | Albertson, NC 28508 | $2,102 |
180 | Mitchell K Paige | Faison, NC 28341 | $2,060 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”