Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Edgecombe County, North Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 142
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Edgecombe County, North Carolina totaled $874,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gerald Tyner Jr Farms Inc | Elm City, NC 27822 | $918 |
82 | Howard Jerome Webb | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $907 |
83 | Joe Kenneth Webb | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $907 |
84 | John E Lancaster Jr | Elm City, NC 27822 | $890 |
85 | Jl Whitehurst Farms Inc | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $883 |
86 | John E Lancaster Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $881 |
87 | Henry B Roberson II | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $877 |
88 | Carl Sidney Scott | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $876 |
89 | Landon Scott Dail | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $866 |
90 | Ann Angus Farms Inc | Rocky Mount, NC 27801 | $842 |
91 | John Wiley Carson | Bethel, NC 27812 | $819 |
92 | Andrew Taylor Carson | Bethel, NC 27812 | $819 |
93 | Edward M Brown III | Oak City, NC 27857 | $818 |
94 | Lancaster Family Farms Inc | Rocky Mount, NC 27801 | $816 |
95 | Ts Whitehurst Farms Inc | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $814 |
96 | Austin Norris Harrell | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $802 |
97 | John Clayton Harrell | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $802 |
98 | D & T Eason Farms Inc | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $764 |
99 | R B Lancaster & Sons Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $729 |
100 | Conetoe Creek Farms LLC | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”