Farm Subsidy information
Gaston County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Gaston County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 72
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gaston County, North Carolina totaled $630,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Eaker Dairy Inc | Cherryville, NC 28021 | $142,798 |
2 | Mary H Proctor | Bessemer City, NC 28016 | $95,683 |
3 | Forest Pine Resources, LLC | Belmont, NC 28012 | $52,875 |
4 | Stowe Timber LLC | Gastonia, NC 28056 | $52,875 |
5 | Melvin L Kiser Jr | Bessemer City, NC 28016 | $26,719 |
6 | Charles D Hamilton II | Lincolnton, NC 28092 | $17,390 |
7 | Richard S Glover | Bessemer City, NC 28016 | $14,309 |
8 | Tony G Cooper | Bessemer City, NC 28016 | $13,259 |
9 | Adrian Certain | Bessemer City, NC 28016 | $13,185 |
10 | Richard D Plonk Jr | Dallas, NC 28034 | $13,086 |
11 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $11,900 |
12 | Steven R Gunnell | Cherryville, NC 28021 | $7,102 |
13 | Richard K Oates | Gastonia, NC 28052 | $5,107 |
14 | Donald Russell Carpenter Jr | Bessemer City, NC 28016 | $4,191 |
15 | David Charles Stroup | Bessemer City, NC 28016 | $4,128 |
16 | Richard Eugene Hamrick | Lawndale, NC 28090 | $3,919 |
17 | Robert B Carroll | Cherryville, NC 28021 | $3,705 |
18 | Rodney Jay Rednour | Gastonia, NC 28052 | $3,242 |
19 | Fred P Robinson | Bessemer City, NC 28016 | $3,073 |
20 | Jack Neal Scism Jr | Kings Mountain, NC 28086 | $2,844 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>