Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Greene County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 194
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Greene County, North Carolina totaled $525,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ellis Scott Wooten | Kinston, NC 28504 | $4,119 |
42 | Jimmy A Dail Farms Inc | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $3,885 |
43 | Richard Speight Harper Jr | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $3,692 |
44 | Stacy Ham Thomas | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $3,659 |
45 | David C Harrison | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $3,418 |
46 | Berry F Pate | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $3,297 |
47 | Jack Allen Farms, LLC | Winterville, NC 28590 | $3,185 |
48 | Rsb Farms Inc | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $3,055 |
49 | Christopher Sugg | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $3,020 |
50 | Suggs Farms Inc | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $2,995 |
51 | James T Smith II | Goldsboro, NC 27534 | $2,973 |
52 | Gray's New Hope Farm LLC | La Grange, NC 28551 | $2,930 |
53 | Ginn Farms LLC | La Grange, NC 28551 | $2,728 |
54 | Barrow Farms Of Greene County Inc. | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $2,618 |
55 | William R Vandiford | Ayden, NC 28513 | $2,547 |
56 | Shackelford Farms Inc | Hookerton, NC 28538 | $2,448 |
57 | Ronnie Clay Miller | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $2,409 |
58 | Thomas Sugg | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $2,396 |
59 | Johnnie West | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $2,341 |
60 | W E Sugg III | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $2,211 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”