Farm Subsidy information
Greene County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Greene County, North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 285
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Greene County, North Carolina totaled $11,720,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Phillips Acres Inc | Farmville, NC 27828 | $122,347 |
22 | Arba Farms Inc | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $118,510 |
23 | Chad Ginn Farms LLC | La Grange, NC 28551 | $112,028 |
24 | Rsb Farms Inc | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $111,411 |
25 | Johnny & Jimmy Lewis Partnership | Farmville, NC 27828 | $110,402 |
26 | Dennis Ray Wood | Hookerton, NC 28538 | $109,981 |
27 | Clayridge Farms Inc | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $107,590 |
28 | Jerry Jones | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $103,186 |
29 | Mary G Jones | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $97,699 |
30 | Triple M Farms Inc | Hookerton, NC 28538 | $96,508 |
31 | Harrison Farms LLC | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $88,074 |
32 | Timothy C Wood | Hookerton, NC 28538 | $82,896 |
33 | Ginn Farms LLC | La Grange, NC 28551 | $81,022 |
34 | Joshua Adam Relyea | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $70,716 |
35 | Murray Farms Of Maury LLC | Maury, NC 28554 | $69,840 |
36 | James A Murray Jr | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $67,188 |
37 | F L Walston Jr Inc | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $67,062 |
38 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $65,348 |
39 | Jimmy A Dail Farms Inc | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $62,678 |
40 | Shackelford Farms Inc | Hookerton, NC 28538 | $62,300 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”