Total Emergency Relief Program in Halifax County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 81
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Halifax County, North Carolina totaled $3,135,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $240,769 |
2 | Michael Morris | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $172,179 |
3 | Inscoe Family Farms LLC | Littleton, NC 27850 | $136,516 |
4 | Latros Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $132,144 |
5 | A N Dickens Jr | Halifax, NC 27839 | $132,131 |
6 | G E Pendleton III Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $130,981 |
7 | Pike Family Farms Partnership | Littleton, NC 27850 | $109,832 |
8 | Grant Staton Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $104,612 |
9 | Chris A Braddy Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $85,646 |
10 | Garner Family Farms | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $81,554 |
11 | Ashley P Mohorn | Littleton, NC 27850 | $81,005 |
12 | Jacob L Dickens III | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $79,957 |
13 | James M Hale | Halifax, NC 27839 | $73,146 |
14 | Kl&z Farms LLC | Littleton, NC 27850 | $72,973 |
15 | James Inscoe | Littleton, NC 27850 | $72,598 |
16 | Jerol Hale | Halifax, NC 27839 | $71,881 |
17 | Melvin Hale | Halifax, NC 27839 | $71,879 |
18 | Frederick Dunn Jr | Enfield, NC 27823 | $70,581 |
19 | Haywood E Harrell | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $64,836 |
20 | Melissa C Dickens | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $54,723 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>