Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Halifax County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 159
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Halifax County, North Carolina totaled $1,551,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Rolling T Farms LLC | Nashville, NC 27856 | $5,140 |
82 | Silas Kent Smith | Rocky Mount, NC 27804 | $5,106 |
83 | Buzzardtown Farms LLC | Halifax, NC 27839 | $5,035 |
84 | Edward S Gardner Sr | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $4,826 |
85 | Fisher Farms Partnership | Whitakers, NC 27891 | $4,522 |
86 | B F Morris Jr | Littleton, NC 27850 | $4,513 |
87 | Vergie F Johnson | Halifax, NC 27839 | $4,177 |
88 | Claude D Inscoe Jr | Littleton, NC 27850 | $4,079 |
89 | Edward B Liles | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $4,041 |
90 | Z3 Agriculture LLC | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $3,982 |
91 | Billy Ray Batchelor | Enfield, NC 27823 | $3,896 |
92 | Reginald E Harrell | Halifax, NC 27839 | $3,760 |
93 | Barry L Judge | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $3,545 |
94 | A T Winslow Farms Inc | Oak City, NC 27857 | $3,514 |
95 | Ashley P Mohorn | Littleton, NC 27850 | $3,409 |
96 | Clement Family Farms LLC | Enfield, NC 27823 | $3,222 |
97 | Russell Heath Harrell | Oak City, NC 27857 | $3,189 |
98 | Kiahall Farms LLC | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $2,911 |
99 | Michael Brandon Hale | Littleton, NC 27850 | $2,904 |
100 | John W Harrell | Aulander, NC 27805 | $2,762 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”