Deficiency Payment in Halifax County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 223
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Halifax County, North Carolina totaled $119,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jesse L Bunch Jr | Enfield, NC 27823 | $14,186 |
2 | Jack H Winslow Fms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $13,687 |
3 | Ventosa Plantation | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $12,826 |
4 | James H & E Darrell Fleming | Enfield, NC 27823 | $9,236 |
5 | Jerry Lee Hamill | Enfield, NC 27823 | $7,978 |
6 | Temple Farm Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $7,653 |
7 | Hubert B Morris | Halifax, NC 27839 | $6,771 |
8 | Robert R Waters Jr | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $6,144 |
9 | Robert Brent Fleming A & B Farms | Halifax, NC 27839 | $5,914 |
10 | Zeb Winslow Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $5,591 |
11 | Jake Taylor Farms Inc | Bradenton, FL 34203 | $4,968 |
12 | R P & E C Garner | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $4,598 |
13 | Isles Farms | Littleton, NC 27850 | $4,551 |
14 | Carter Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $4,184 |
15 | Pike Brothers | Littleton, NC 27850 | $4,172 |
16 | C W Locke & Sons Inc | Enfield, NC 27823 | $4,125 |
17 | Wayne Edwards Farms | Whitakers, NC 27891 | $3,877 |
18 | John E & Lloyd N Winslow Jr | Halifax, NC 27839 | $3,086 |
19 | Earl Adkins | Enfield, NC 27823 | $3,050 |
20 | Mills Kitchin | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $2,914 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>