Tobacco Loss Assistance Program in Hoke County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 363
Recipients of Tobacco Loss Assistance Program from farms in Hoke County, North Carolina totaled $703,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kathryn Rogers | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $1,960 |
62 | Margaret Burnette | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $1,960 |
63 | Geraldine Dalton | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,922 |
64 | Annie Rebecca Jacobs Est | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $1,887 |
65 | Verlis Jacobs Jr | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $1,884 |
66 | John D Gillis II | Fayetteville, NC 28306 | $1,851 |
67 | David Miller Gillis | Fayetteville, NC 28306 | $1,851 |
68 | John Oliver Hill | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,800 |
69 | Joseph C Poole | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,747 |
70 | Frances W Currie | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,720 |
71 | Harold D Monroe | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,699 |
72 | J L Mcneill Family Farm | Southern Pines, NC 28387 | $1,621 |
73 | Hendrix Livestock Inc | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,619 |
74 | Mary Virginia Mcfadyen | Southern Pines, NC 28387 | $1,618 |
75 | W D Mcphaul | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $1,552 |
76 | Lois Austin | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,486 |
77 | Mildred S Maxwell | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,466 |
78 | Roy Lee Murchison | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,444 |
79 | Steve Hedgpeth | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,408 |
80 | Frances J Gordon | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,398 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”