Farm Subsidy information
Hoke County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Hoke County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 820
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hoke County, North Carolina totaled $62,040,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mcgun Inc | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $95,936 |
82 | Mary Virginia Mcfadyen | Southern Pines, NC 28387 | $91,338 |
83 | Mary Virgina Mcfadyen Limited Par | Raleigh, NC 27612 | $84,953 |
84 | John D Gillis II | Fayetteville, NC 28306 | $81,993 |
85 | John D Mcbryde | Shannon, NC 28386 | $81,352 |
86 | Tracy Davis-gibson | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $80,750 |
87 | J D Mcleod Farm | Raeford, NC 28376 | $80,708 |
88 | David Jerry Harris | Raeford, NC 28376 | $79,896 |
89 | Alfred N Prewitt Estate | Fayetteville, NC 28305 | $79,304 |
90 | William R Wilkins | Shannon, NC 28386 | $77,965 |
91 | Roger Pierce | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $74,350 |
92 | Averitt Farms | Fayetteville, NC 28306 | $66,538 |
93 | Joseph Porter | Ore City, TX 75683 | $64,503 |
94 | Matthew N Lindsay | Raeford, NC 28376 | $63,389 |
95 | Marshall Mcn Newton | Raeford, NC 28376 | $62,345 |
96 | James P Plummer Jr | Raeford, NC 28376 | $62,268 |
97 | Angus C Mcdonald | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $62,224 |
98 | Joseph Neill Howell Jr | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $60,984 |
99 | William Warren Howell | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $60,984 |
100 | Tall Timber Inc | Kinston, NC 28501 | $59,940 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”