Farm Subsidy information
Hoke County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Hoke County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 820
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hoke County, North Carolina totaled $62,040,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hendrix Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $4,254,440 |
2 | Edens Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $2,424,900 |
3 | Gold Hill Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $2,137,308 |
4 | Andrew L Gibson | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $1,475,938 |
5 | Robert A Wright | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,358,027 |
6 | Newton Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,239,909 |
7 | Kelly Edens Archambault | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $1,213,106 |
8 | Edgar M Baker | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,156,513 |
9 | T B Upchurch Inc | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,096,284 |
10 | Edens & Autry Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $1,049,790 |
11 | Monroe Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,042,523 |
12 | Johnny H Boyles | Raeford, NC 28376 | $972,174 |
13 | Hendrix Livestock Inc | Raeford, NC 28376 | $880,851 |
14 | Inverleith Farms Inc | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $838,357 |
15 | James W Mcgougan | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $827,597 |
16 | Roy Wood Jr | Pinehurst, NC 28374 | $762,365 |
17 | W W Cameron Jr | Raeford, NC 28376 | $729,058 |
18 | A & R Growers Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $700,083 |
19 | Gibson Farms Of Hoke Co Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $698,984 |
20 | Fred B Harris | Raeford, NC 28376 | $692,798 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>