Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Hoke County, North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 51
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Hoke County, North Carolina totaled $41,998 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Robert A Wright Jr | Raeford, NC 28376 | $423 |
| 22 | Kelly Edens Archambault | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $407 |
| 23 | John L Council | Shannon, NC 28386 | $399 |
| 24 | Forbis Farms Inc | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $348 |
| 25 | S & S Swine Mgt | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $327 |
| 26 | Sandra B Edens | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $295 |
| 27 | Walton Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $285 |
| 28 | Benny Oldham | Wagram, NC 28396 | $260 |
| 29 | Rockdale Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $250 |
| 30 | Aaron Stack | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $244 |
| 31 | Mcdonald Brothers | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $225 |
| 32 | Warner Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $212 |
| 33 | Pete Lindsay Locklear | Pembroke, NC 28372 | $202 |
| 34 | Alvin Mccutchen Sr | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $162 |
| 35 | Nancy L Mcphaul | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $158 |
| 36 | Elliott Dewayne Lloyd | Maxton, NC 28364 | $156 |
| 37 | Leon Smith | Maxton, NC 28364 | $152 |
| 38 | Gillis Hill Road Produce | Fayetteville, NC 28306 | $146 |
| 39 | Hagler Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $137 |
| 40 | Gibson Farms Of Hoke Co Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $126 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf