Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Hyde County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 104
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Hyde County, North Carolina totaled $409,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wade L Hubers | Pantego, NC 27860 | $6,776 |
22 | Bethany Pugh | Engelhard, NC 27824 | $6,379 |
23 | North Lake Farms | Fairfield, NC 27826 | $6,179 |
24 | Sow & Reap Farms LLC | Bath, NC 27808 | $6,122 |
25 | Carawan Farms Inc | Swanquarter, NC 27885 | $5,927 |
26 | Eric Kelly Cahoon | Engelhard, NC 27824 | $5,624 |
27 | Tamara A Cahoon | Engelhard, NC 27824 | $5,624 |
28 | Joseph B Williams | Fairfield, NC 27826 | $4,246 |
29 | Diana Williams | Fairfield, NC 27826 | $3,918 |
30 | Olian R Williams Jr | Scranton, NC 27875 | $3,858 |
31 | Olian R Williams III | Scranton, NC 27875 | $3,354 |
32 | Tooley Brothers Inc | Scranton, NC 27875 | $3,204 |
33 | Timothy A Gibbs | Engelhard, NC 27824 | $3,041 |
34 | Mann Farms Inc | Fairfield, NC 27826 | $2,922 |
35 | K4 Farms LLC | Pantego, NC 27860 | $2,782 |
36 | Unit 1 Farms LLC | Pantego, NC 27860 | $2,687 |
37 | Don Nixon Farms LLC | Fairfield, NC 27826 | $2,541 |
38 | Jason Williams | Fairfield, NC 27826 | $2,394 |
39 | Drag Farms LLC | Pantego, NC 27860 | $2,229 |
40 | Anthony Van Vuren | Washington, NC 27889 | $1,669 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”