Loan Deficiency in Martin County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 607
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Martin County, North Carolina totaled $25,687,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Copeland Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $729,125 |
2 | Keel Brothers Farms | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $669,642 |
3 | David C Mayer | Hobgood, NC 27843 | $514,689 |
4 | Rainbow Farms Inc | Hamilton, NC 27840 | $472,867 |
5 | Cannon Bros Farms Inc | Oak City, NC 27857 | $453,037 |
6 | Frederick Lowe Chance | Bethel, NC 27812 | $384,204 |
7 | James Family Farms | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $382,035 |
8 | Taylor Slade | Williamston, NC 27892 | $357,349 |
9 | Edmondson Farms Management LLC | Oak City, NC 27857 | $321,471 |
10 | Joe Simpson | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $316,415 |
11 | Stalls Farming Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $314,516 |
12 | Starling Bell Jr | Oak City, NC 27857 | $310,617 |
13 | Conoho Farms Inc | Oak City, NC 27857 | $295,628 |
14 | J Wayne Carlisle | Hamilton, NC 27840 | $289,016 |
15 | Kenneth H Roberson | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $284,884 |
16 | Manning & Hardison Farms Inc | Williamston, NC 27892 | $284,383 |
17 | Ervin Bell | Oak City, NC 27857 | $282,280 |
18 | Charlie James & Sons | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $281,844 |
19 | Russell Heath Harrell | Oak City, NC 27857 | $269,540 |
20 | Chris A Braddy Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $261,221 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>