Tobacco Payment Program in Martin County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,986
Recipients of Tobacco Payment Program from farms in Martin County, North Carolina totaled $428,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Bruce Peele Jr | Williamston, NC 27892 | $1,033 |
102 | R Rudolph Everett | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $995 |
103 | Loyall B Corey | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $975 |
104 | L Dail Rodgerson | Williamston, NC 27892 | $965 |
105 | James Albert Williams | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $956 |
106 | James W Council Jr | Weaverville, NC 28787 | $938 |
107 | Stephen L Williams | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $933 |
108 | Dwayne Ange | Jamesville, NC 27846 | $927 |
109 | Whitehead Brothers Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $921 |
110 | Parker Farms | Oak City, NC 27857 | $915 |
111 | Jwh Farms Inc | Williamston, NC 27892 | $912 |
112 | Clifford Bennet Lilley | Williamston, NC 27892 | $899 |
113 | Earl Eugene Hyman | Oak City, NC 27857 | $879 |
114 | House Farming Inc | Clemmons, NC 27012 | $855 |
115 | Dorothy R Hardison | Williamston, NC 27892 | $846 |
116 | W H Vanderford Jr | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $843 |
117 | John M Rogers | Winterville, NC 28590 | $835 |
118 | Edward Lee Williams Jr | Williamston, NC 27892 | $834 |
119 | J H Dixon | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $831 |
120 | Billie Peele Roney | Williamston, NC 27892 | $825 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”