Farm Subsidy information
Martin County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Martin County, North Carolina, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 256
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Martin County, North Carolina totaled $8,071,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | David Scott Smith | Oak City, NC 27857 | $1,050 |
122 | , | $1,042 | |
123 | Wendell Dale Redman | Jamesville, NC 27846 | $993 |
124 | , | $930 | |
125 | William Noah Griffin | Williamston, NC 27892 | $890 |
126 | Robersonville Ice And Coal Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $875 |
127 | Virginia T Leggett | Oak City, NC 27857 | $865 |
128 | James O Harrell Jr | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $770 |
129 | , | $763 | |
130 | Paul Harris Farms Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $760 |
131 | Eric B Harrell | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $747 |
132 | Michael S Harrell | Nashville, NC 27856 | $747 |
133 | Gregory Daniels | Williamston, NC 27892 | $720 |
134 | Nancy W Walker | Charlotte, NC 28262 | $695 |
135 | Judy W Davenport | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $695 |
136 | Holden T Swearingen | Hamilton, NC 27840 | $694 |
137 | John Gates Peele | Oak City, NC 27857 | $691 |
138 | Donald Biggs Harrison III | Columbia, SC 29223 | $688 |
139 | Alice Elizabeth Harrison | Raleigh, NC 27612 | $688 |
140 | Mary Lynn Cherry Kidd | Raleigh, NC 27607 | $684 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”