Cotton Ginning Program in Martin County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 177
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Martin County, North Carolina totaled $2,050,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William Lilley | Williamston, NC 27892 | $18,858 |
42 | Charlie James & Sons | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $18,268 |
43 | Robert L Perry Jr | Williamston, NC 27892 | $18,099 |
44 | Starling Bell Jr | Oak City, NC 27857 | $17,845 |
45 | T & D Bowen Farms Inc | Williamston, NC 27892 | $16,896 |
46 | Russell D Roberson Jr | Williamston, NC 27892 | $16,232 |
47 | Roebuck Farms Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $15,909 |
48 | Frederick Lowe Chance | Bethel, NC 27812 | $15,383 |
49 | James David Rogerson | Williamston, NC 27892 | $14,902 |
50 | Edmondson Ag LLC | Oak City, NC 27857 | $14,860 |
51 | Kenneth M Gurganus | Williamston, NC 27892 | $14,049 |
52 | Coltrain Farms | Jamesville, NC 27846 | $13,534 |
53 | Roger M Gurganus | Williamston, NC 27892 | $13,388 |
54 | Ben Sheppard Cowin | Williamston, NC 27892 | $13,351 |
55 | Palmyra Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $13,006 |
56 | Lance R Grimes | Williamston, NC 27892 | $12,981 |
57 | Billy Gerald Wynn | Williamston, NC 27892 | $12,913 |
58 | House Farming Inc | Clemmons, NC 27012 | $12,807 |
59 | Edward Lee Williams Jr | Williamston, NC 27892 | $12,606 |
60 | David Scott Smith | Oak City, NC 27857 | $11,469 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”