Peanut Quota Buyout Program in Martin County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,143
Recipients of Peanut Quota Buyout Program from farms in Martin County, North Carolina totaled $15,042,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Peanut Quota Buyout Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | D G Matthews Son Inc | Hamilton, NC 27840 | $294,640 |
2 | J Melvin Bowen | Williamston, NC 27892 | $186,295 |
3 | Fate B Everett Jr | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $138,735 |
4 | Roberson Farms LLC | Ocracoke, NC 27960 | $120,920 |
5 | W M Green | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $119,515 |
6 | T E Purvis | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $106,290 |
7 | James W Council Jr | Weaverville, NC 28787 | $100,655 |
8 | Fred F Pollard Est | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $92,045 |
9 | Seth B Perry | Williamston, NC 27892 | $91,945 |
10 | Mamie T Slade | Williamston, NC 27892 | $91,275 |
11 | Willis Paul Harris Jr | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $87,450 |
12 | Mary Charles Coppage | Williamston, NC 27892 | $76,240 |
13 | Norman Tisdale & Company | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $74,190 |
14 | Julius Fleming Pollard | Durham, NC 27705 | $73,195 |
15 | Henry Brown Winslow | Hamilton, NC 27840 | $72,250 |
16 | Robert W Clark | Williamston, NC 27892 | $70,795 |
17 | W Robert Harris | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $70,285 |
18 | C Wesley Copeland Jr | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $66,360 |
19 | Fred Hardison | Williamston, NC 27892 | $66,115 |
20 | Roland Coburn Jr | Jamesville, NC 27846 | $65,565 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>