Farm Subsidy information

Martin County, North Carolina

Total Subsidies in Martin County, North Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,579

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Martin County, North Carolina totaled $291,148,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
41Edward M Brown IIIOak City, NC 27857$1,221,103
42Jesse W CarlisleHamilton, NC 27840$1,217,798
43Seth B PerryWilliamston, NC 27892$1,213,419
44Donnie G RobersonRobersonville, NC 27871$1,144,844
45James Keith WynneWilliamston, NC 27892$1,133,770
46Joel Slade PeeleOak City, NC 27857$1,120,261
47Roberson Farms LLCOcracoke, NC 27960$1,120,108
48Edward Lee Williams JrWilliamston, NC 27892$1,113,169
49James L CoreyRobersonville, NC 27871$1,104,599
50D G Matthews Son IncHamilton, NC 27840$1,097,300
51Billy Gerald WynnWilliamston, NC 27892$1,087,881
52J Wayne CarlisleHamilton, NC 27840$1,076,087
53William LilleyWilliamston, NC 27892$1,073,976
54Robert L Perry JrWilliamston, NC 27892$1,072,423
55Henry B Roberson IIRobersonville, NC 27871$1,063,013
56Joe SimpsonRobersonville, NC 27871$1,032,014
57Dalton O PurvisBethel, NC 27812$1,029,313
58Norman A RobersonRobersonville, NC 27871$1,012,148
59Whitehurst Farms PtnsConetoe, NC 27819$994,828
60C Warren MatthewsWilliamston, NC 27892$990,597

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag