Market Gains in Martin County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 315
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Martin County, North Carolina totaled $3,122,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Keel Brothers Farms | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $174,274 |
2 | E & V Farms | Oak City, NC 27857 | $134,491 |
3 | Copeland Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $86,123 |
4 | Charlie James & Sons | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $81,064 |
5 | Flat Swamp Farms Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $77,228 |
6 | Henry B Roberson II | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $69,576 |
7 | Pine Log Farms Inc | Williamston, NC 27892 | $64,306 |
8 | Rainbow Farms Inc | Hamilton, NC 27840 | $60,165 |
9 | A T Winslow Farms Inc | Oak City, NC 27857 | $59,290 |
10 | W Robert Harris Farms Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $58,537 |
11 | Frederick Lowe Chance | Bethel, NC 27812 | $55,825 |
12 | Edward M Brown III | Oak City, NC 27857 | $54,895 |
13 | Cannon Bros Farms Inc | Oak City, NC 27857 | $54,470 |
14 | Stephen H Davis | Jamesville, NC 27846 | $54,197 |
15 | Russell D Roberson Jr | Williamston, NC 27892 | $52,886 |
16 | Edmondson Ag LLC | Oak City, NC 27857 | $48,924 |
17 | J Melvin Bowen | Williamston, NC 27892 | $46,782 |
18 | Roebuck Farms Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $45,844 |
19 | Conoho Farms Inc | Oak City, NC 27857 | $45,110 |
20 | David E Whitehurst Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $45,055 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>